• Thu, Mar 21 - 4:00 pm ET

I Have An Irrational Hatred Of Cutesy Monster Dolls & Toys

vampletsIt started with the Monster High dolls. I remember seeing them in the toy aisle with their Bratz-style bobble-heads, short skirts, and fishnet stockings. I immediately didn’t like them and steered my daughter away, vaguely mumbling something about inappropriateness when she asked to look at them. She was only four at the time and definitely didn’t need the more grown-up girls’ toys, so I didn’t worry too much about it. I figured we would cross that bridge when we came to it.

Then, I got an email from the designer in charge of the revamped My Little Pony and Littlest Pet Shop lines, Gayle Middleton, about her newest toy line currently being promoted on Kickstarter. This super successful toy creator was striking out on her own to start a new line of children’s toys called Vamplets.

At the center of the toy line are monster babies, from vampyres to werewolves to zombies, who are adorably creepy. They drink little bottles of red blood. They have skull bibs with matching hair bows. Gayle, or “G-Ra” as she can apparently be called, created a world called Gloomvania where the monsters call home. She has comic books planned to tell the characters’ stories and a mortal teenage nanny to take care of the monster babies. It’s an elaborate and compelling set-up.

But I would absolutely never buy it for my daughter, even though she’s definitely their target market.

I have a hard time putting into words just why I dislike these monster dolls and toys so much. Maybe I’m just a sheep who has been sold on the idea that children should be playing with sweet and cuddly creatures who do good and always have a happy ending. It’s definitely possible. I’ll admit to being a Disney fan.

But at the same time, I feel like there’s a legitimate point to be raised about celebrating toys that are “rotten to the core,” toys that represent bad guys and monsters that most children find scary. It feels like we’re trying to force an adult impulse to “explore the dark side” onto our children.

Vampires and zombies have been popular for a while now. They seem trendy, just the clothes and stylings of all these monster toys. But I’m just not so sure that toys need to be trendy. There’s a reason that some of the most basic and classic toys are still hanging around and incredibly popular with kids. Basic LEGOs and generic babydolls that don’t need some huge sales shtick, but just let kids use their own imagination.

Of course, there is a place in children’s toys for companies to create an entire world for kids to explore. It’s a tendency that I think seems to be growing, and one that Middleton previously succeeded in for My Little Pony and Littlest Pet Shops, both of which got television shows and book series to go along with their product relaunches. But are Gloomvania and Monster High the types of imaginary spaces I want my daughter occupying? Not really. They don’t feel so safe or innocent to me.

I’m not trying to say that no one else should buy these toys for their children. Obviously, we all have our own right to choose what our kids would like and what would benefit them. I’m not calling for Monster High to be taken off the shelves. But I do wonder if there are other parents out there like me, hesitant to introduce their children to these spooky yet stylish toy lines. Are you guys all playing vampyre babies without me?

(Photo: Kickstarter)

Share This Post:
  • Reese

    I just think think they’re too gruesome and gothic for little kids. Drinking bottles of blood? no, thanks.

  • Tea

    I like the bat, the kitten, and the pony. The other ones kind of unsettle me, and not in a genuine scary way, and I’m not quite sure why. The New Littlest Pet Shop toys have the same effect on me.

    I like a lot of spooky-cute stuff, like Ruby Gloom. I just wish these toys were something different and not just “spooky” versions of the usual girl fare, something more unisex. Kids like scary things, and I genuinely think kids like being a little scared, It’s why we loved scaring ourselves and each other so much when we were little. My own mom didn’t let me watch “The Nightmare Before Christmas” or the “Beetlejuice” cartoons because she was afraid I’d be traumatized, so I just snuck them and they became my favorites anyway.

  • http://www.facebook.com/valerisexton.jones Valeri Jones

    My sister won’t allow her two girls to play with Bratz or Monster High dolls. It’s not because of creep-factor, but because of the way they are dressed. My sister says, “They look like little tramps and I just don’t want my girls thinking that’s how they are supposed to dress.” Well, I couldn’t agree more.

    • Diana

      I dislike the general anorexic, deformed head look of them. I think they would have scared me when I was small.

    • Justme

      I don’t like that you have to take their entire foot off to change their shoe.

    • http://www.facebook.com/valerisexton.jones Valeri Jones

      Oh wow. Being that my nieces aren’t allowed to play with them and all I have are boys, I wasn’t aware this was the case. Yuck.

    • Justme

      They were popular while I was in college and baby-sitting. I’ll take my “ridiculously out of natural proportion Barbie” over a footless bobble head any day.

    • http://www.facebook.com/valerisexton.jones Valeri Jones

      Agreed!

  • http://www.facebook.com/KatjaMouse Katja Yount

    I think you’re underestimating what kids may find genuinely scary or what they can truly handle. When I was a kid I remember reveling in the villains in Disney movies and the crazy visuals in classic fairy tale books. And my family being first generation American we had a number of children’s books from Germany that had some really messed/disturbing imagery that didn’t phase me until I was an adult. I thought they were kind of psychedelic, creative. It wasn’t until I was a teenager/adult that I looked back on them and think to myself “How did I not get messed up looking at these?” Remember, there was even a time when parents and teachers thought that Where the Wild Things Are would be too disturbing and frightful for children.

    I think that some of these more darker additions to my children’s lit collection rounded out some of my creativity. It also influenced some of my own artwork which my 7 year old nephews think are “way awesome”.

  • Diana

    I think the pseudo-ugly goulish stuff can be fun for older kids, but I’d like to think that little kids can be influenced positively by beautiful stuff. I recently got sick of the frozen faced, dead eyed plastic dolls that my 7 year old and her friends were playing with. I got her one of these:

    http://www.waldorfdollshop.co.uk/handmade-waldorf-doll-uk/medium-size-dolls/results,11-10.html

    ( the little readhead in the green dress.) I thought the age of the rag doll might be over but they are inseparable! She’s even started writing a “book” about her little friend’s adventures.

  • Allison

    It’s funny, I am a huuuuuge horror fan. When I was in third grade I started sneaking Stephen King books out of my parents room, and I will always love scary movies. However, for some reason I don’t like the idea of my daughter being exposed to this stuff too early. Maybe I feel like she should be exposed to all that is good and wonderful first, and if she chooses eventually to enjoy the darker side of life, that will be fine, but not before she has had a chance to enjoy everything else first.

  • Pingback: Monster High Dolls Are Feminist Despite Their Sexy Clothing And Heels

  • http://www.facebook.com/sean.phillips.9081 Sean Phillips

    this is a little absurd. kids aren’t born into the world with the knowledge that vampires and zombies are evil. these toys teach kids that just because you’re a “monster” you can be beautiful, smart, funny, fun, cute, anything you want to be. in fact, the assumption here is the exact opposite of what kids learn from these toys: people judge you based on your looks, and you’re defined by this rather than who you really are.

    • Diana

      Yeah but BOTTLES of BLOOD.

    • http://www.facebook.com/sean.phillips.9081 Sean Phillips

      that’s cute! lol i don’t think that implies evil, just creepy and weird. which is cool to kids.

    • http://www.facebook.com/sharon.harman.923 Sharon Harman

      The bottles don’t come with the dolls,so you don’t have to purchase it if you don’t want to. I also think the target audience for these toys is age 10+.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jen-Clark/100000568225513 Jen Clark

    See, if they had things like this when I was a kid, I would have had a lot more dolls to go a long with my games and pokemon. When I was young all I knew of was the living dead dolls, which I’ve always wanted to collect, unfortunately, my parents wouldnt get them because they were hard to find sometimes and often ranged 30-60 dollars per doll. I was basically raised on gore and horror, yes I might be a little weird, and I’m completely insensitive to it now, but because of it I never had a phobia of “monsters”, ghosts or the dark. My mother gave me a love for the “dark side”, so I revel in it, instead of fainting at the slightest hint of guts or a bump in the night. It probably differs from each person, but it’s possible that introducing children to “scary” things might be beneficial in a way, it can possibly teach them to like and have fun with fantasy monsters that they’d otherwise develop a phobia of upon finding out about them. I’m just speculating of course.