• Sat, Jan 12 - 2:00 pm ET

Someone Should Tell This Notre Dame Professor That Attachment Parenting Has Already Been Invented

shutterstock_102399229A Notre Dame psychology professor believes that what she calls “modern day parenting” is setting our children up for failure later in life. Darcia Narvaez‘s research has led her to write a book that tells us all how to raise healthy, well-adjusted children. Too bad Dr. Sears thought of it first.

From the South Bend Tribune:

Narvaez believes parenting practices like feeding babies infant formula, sleep training, and the isolation of babies in their own rooms can negatively impact their moral development.

Narvaez believes moms should opt for natural child birth, touch constantly in the first year and breastfeeding for several years.

“It’s the babies that are breastfed, the ones that are touched constantly, the ones that have responsive parents, they tend to be the ones that are more empathic, they care about other people more, and they have better social skills and they are better and have higher emotional intelligence and higher intelligence,” says Narvaez.

Hmm. Sounds familiar. Maybe it’s because these ideas are the basis for Attachment Parenting – everyone’s favorite tool for guilting mothers into believing they’re not spending enough quality time with their kids. Just kidding. Sort of. But seriously – the extended breastfeeding, the room sharing, the constant nurturing – what’s new about this study? I guess we’ll see when it comes out and launches yet another “mom war.”

“This is going against the tide. Because people don’t want to hear it,” says Narvaez, “but I am fiercely for babies. I am a baby advocate. Sometimes I step on toes.” I hate to break it to you lady, but telling women how to raise their children is not a new practice. Mother-in-laws have been doing it since the beginning of time. Do we really need another study damning formula-feeding and – gasp – parents who have the nerve to put their children in their own rooms?

Yawn.

(photo: janoon028/ Shutterstock.com)

You can reach this post's author, Maria Guido, on twitter.
Share This Post:
  • Andrea

    How about this: UP YOUR LADY.

    I raise my children how *I* think it’s best. They slept in their own rooms, they had formula (although not exclusively for my second), and they weren’t attached to my boobs 24/7. And guess what: they are great kids, with lots of friends, superb grades, in gifted programs at school, they play sports (although they are not all that great at that, lol), they participate in scouting, and have a variety of interests they pursue outside of school. They are also well mannered, polite (well outside the house anyways), they are VERY sensitive to other people’s feelings, and are always helping others.

    So yeah I sound like a huge freakin BRAGGART, but I am sick to death of people telling me that I am gonna have basically psychopathic ASSHOLES because I didn’t keep them attached to my tits 24/7 for the first 5 years of their lives and because I had a LIFE that didn’t involve them on occasion.

    • Andrea

      PS: I also have a MARRIAGE (an active one!) because I didn’t share a bed with my babies. I chose to have sex with my husband instead. *GASP!!!*

    • http://twitter.com/mariaguido Guerrilla Mom

      Amen.

    • Dlee

      Speaking from personal experience, co-sleepers still have sex. (And no, we don’t do it with the baby in the bed with us.)

    • Victoria

      I’m 6 mos preg with my first, and my best friend has a 9 month old. She does AP and her husband is obviously..you know, tense, and pulling his hair out. I don’t want to ask her, so…anyone want to tell me how AP nookie works??? I don’t want to try AP if it means kicking husband to the couch or have to do it with the baby in the bed (I HAVE HEARD THIS!).Thanks.

    • Andrea

      Well, the baby sleeps with you. Dlee said they do have sex and not while the baby is in the bed with you. So apparently that must mean you have to screw in different areas of the house. Which I can grant you, can be fun. But the thing is, sex after kids is hard enough to coordinate, I really did not need the additional logistical crap.

    • Dlee

      Congrats! Mine is 6 months old and mostly ends up sleeping with us through the night. First, I think you have to be on board with the idea of co-sleeping as a couple. If either of you aren’t (such as your friend’s husband) then maybe it’s not the best idea or needs negotiation. Second, we all sleep in the same bed and there’s no “kicking” anyone to the couch. We only have a double though so sometimes I’ve considered heading there. lol I sleep with the baby curled up under my arm with my body wrapped around him and my partner either curled up against me or with his back to us. The only time we’ve slept on the pull-out couch was (together) when the rest of the house was too hot/cold and the only working air con/heater is in the living room.

      How we do it? Obviously it will differ with all couples but we have a portacot set up that we put the baby in if we want to do it on the bed. Otherwise there’s a spare mattress in the spare bedroom. We get a babysitter for a few hours and come home from the event necessitating a sitter a little early before going to collect the child. Or occasionally the baby will be quietly playing/sleeping on the floor and we can sneak away then.

      Having sex after a kid is difficult, regardless of where the baby spends most of his time sleeping. But it’s not impossible.

    • Victoria

      Yeah, my friend’s husband has a haunted look and a new facial twitch. It makes my husband sad about AP. I finally did ask my friend, and she said “you just have to be spontaneous and creative” but it seems like…she made her baby her primary relationship. I don’t want to do that. Maybe a bassinet by the bed? With occasional co-sleeping?
      @Andrea- Different parts of the house might be fun, but I don’t think I’ll have the energy for trying to set up random encounters either. My friend tells me I won’t be interested in the horizontal polka after I have a baby anyway, but I DON’T BELIEVE HER.

    • StephKay

      I co-sleep with my daughter, starting from when she was 6 months old to now when she’s transitioning to her own room in our new house, she’ll be three next week. I’m also seven months pregnant, so obviously we never stopped having sex.

      Honestly? Even though I’ve been at this bed sharing thing for longer and with an older child than the other woman who answered you, its never been an issue. My partner is huge, bout 6’4 and 250lbs, and a very deep sleeper so baby isn’t in-between us for safety reasons (at least when she was smaller) and convenience since he gets up at 5 am for work and frankly the last thing I need is a toddler up that early. No one gets kicked out of bed, and we still snuggle and talk as much as we ever did. It’s actually even nicer than pre-baby snuggles in a lot of ways. We usually end up in sort of a spooning chain with baby cuddled up to my chest, which I have to say (as the middle spoon in the chain) is probably the nicest way to sleep I’ve ever encountered. In terms of sex logistics, it’s pretty simple. We either pretend we’re teenagers and sneak around the house to alternate locations (which is actually pretty fun), or just quietly move the baby into her bed. She’ll always come back in eventually, but we’ve never ever been interrupted at an awkward moment. At least not since the early days when everyone gets interrupted by a cry every now and then regardless of sleeping arrangements. Often nowadays the little one will doze off on the couch while going through her “I swear I’m not tired!” routine, and when that happens I’ll just go up to bed ahead of her, have a little alone time with my partner, come back eventually and grab her, and all go to sleep in a gigantic family cuddle heap.

      I don’t really co-sleep for traditional AP reasons, but I can honestly say the sex thing hasn’t even registered on my list of challenges cosleeping. Sure there’s a certain degree of needing to work around the baby, but that was the case during the first six months where she slept in her own room too (you know, needing to listen for baby, put baby down first, be quiet to not wake baby etc…). I think it’s one of those things where some parents have a really hard time adjusting their sex life after having a baby no matter what. You just do what works for you and hope for the best, but really, there’s always a way to make a situation work. Although, yeah, I’ve heard of couples just ignoring the baby’s presence and having sex in the bed anyways. Not for me, that seriously squicks me out.

    • Victoria

      Thanks for this, it sounds like a reasonable, do-able thing. I’ll try a few different things and see what works. I appreciate it!

  • meg

    I slept in my own room from the night I came home from the hospital, and was formula fed for several weeks (I was released before my mother, into the care of an aunt, due to my mom almost dying in childbirth. Yeah, it was weird.)

    Then again, I’m sucky at math. NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY!! #Gamechanger

    • whiteroses

      Yeah, this. I feed my son formula, and I am firmly convinced that he’s smarter than a lot of other babies. I caught a lot of flak for it, specifically from my in-laws, until I smiled sweetly and said that my chest wasn’t up for public discussion, thank you. And, like me, my son talks in his sleep. If he slept in my room, I’d never sleep.

      Unless a child’s being abused, nobody else has any say whatsoever in how they are raised.

    • Mamacita74

      Word. I exclusively breastfed my first, and am bfeeding/pumping with my second, but I don’t assume their smarts come from breastfeeding. Genetics and interaction play a much larger role.

    • Mamacita74

      My point being, people need to stop telling moms what to do. It’s your baby and as long as baby is happy, it’s no one else’s biz. :)

    • Justme

      My SIL once said that my brother (who is her husband and a genius) could have been MUCH smarter had my mother breastfed him. Yep. I was done with her after that.

  • K.

    Pro-life/pro-choice debate aside, I laugh when someone says they’re a “baby advocate.” Since when do babies need ‘advocates’? There’s no organization out there that advocates baby neglect. There’s no political lobby to eradicate baby rights. No one has declared war on babies.

    Is this woman some old-school Freudian or something? Because Narvaez seems to have forgotten that it’s not like we’re babies and then we’re adults. There’s a whole lot of development that occurs between infancy and adulthood and while I agree that early childhood is an extremely important developmental phase, there is a difference from Russian-orphanage systemic neglect and the variety of ‘attachment levels’ that *most* parents use that all fall within reasonable levels. Moreover, it’s RIDICULOUS to think that co-bedding or not co-bedding or breastfeeding over formula is planting some sort of poisoned root that will forever ruin your child’s life.

    And I’m sorry, but parents need to parent in the way that makes sense to THEM and their lives (within reason, of course–I’m not excusing straight up abuse or neglect), whether that means full-blown attachment parenting or nouveau “French-style-babies-sleep-through-the-night” parenting because if you parent in a way that does NOT work with who you are and how your life is–if you try to breastfeed and pump for 3 years even though your job makes it hell to do so–you are more likely to be stressed out and resentful of your children. And angry, stressed out parents are not good for any baby.

    The entire premise of her argument, that babies need “advocates” because (as implied) parents are too selfish is wrong. Most parents–certainly most mothers in my life–suffer more from guilt and perfectionism than anything else. They need advocates to parent with confidence–THAT would be advocacy on behalf of babies by association.

    It would however, challenge the need for such parenting ‘experts,’ though…

    • Blueathena623

      Thank you. There really does seem to be this sense that there is no middle ground between total AP and orphanage-levels of neglect. So if I snuggle and touch my kid all day but he sleeps in his own room and we sleep train, will my kid be only 50% screwed up?

    • Sara

      Well said! I was going to reply to this article, but you said pretty much exactly what I was going to, only much better than I would have.

    • Avodah

      I don’t think you have read Freud, K.

    • K.

      Really? Why not? ‘Cause I have. But perhaps you have a different take on him.

  • Makabit

    There’s something odd about this one. None of this is remotely new…people were doing all the things she mentions when I was a baby, and that’s almost forty years now. It’s as though she’s just been thawed out of a glacier, to challenge the baby-raising notions of the mid-1960s.

    • http://twitter.com/mariaguido Guerrilla Mom

      “thawed out of a glacier” hahaha

  • Rea

    “responsive” parent does not equal AP. It equals the vast majority of parents out there. If you’re a methhead, you’re probably not all that responsive of a parent. If you got your parenting style from Mommy Dearest, same thing.