Despicable Rush Limbaugh Says Liberals Are Trying To ‘Normalize’ Pedophilia – Just Like They Did With Gay Marriage

Rush LimbaughIt should come as no surprise that Rush Limbaugh said something disgusting and repulsive on his radio show yesterday. We’re all pretty used to this blathering bunch of vocal cords making highly offensive remarks to attract attention. On a normal basis, I advocate ignoring his noxious gas. But every once in a while,  he says something so despicable that I feel like we need to address it.

Yesterday, Rush postulated that liberals are trying to “normalize” pedophilia, just like they apparently did with gay marriage. According to the conservative talk show Godfather:

There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia. It has two aspects to it. One is that sex with children doesn’t hurt them. Kids like it and so do adults, and there’s nothing wrong with it….

Rush goes on to mention an article published by the Guardian that examined medical and academic research about pedophilia, from the 1970s through present-day. One would assume, given Rush’s argument that we are just now attempting to “normalize” pedophilia, that the article determines that present-day thinking is more accepting of adults having sex with children. Of course, that’s not what the piece actually states. It talks about the more lax view of medical experts and researchers regarding pedophilia that was promoted in the 1970s.

It does, however, suggest that those who are attracted to children have a different “sexual orientation.” Academics argue that people who are attracted to children are responding to their own natural feelings, and that we need to pay more attention to the actions they can control. One researcher explains:

“Adult sexual attraction to children is part of the continuum of human sexuality; it’s not something we can eliminate. If we can talk about this rationally – acknowledge that yes, men do get sexually attracted to children, but no, they don’t have to act on it – we can maybe avoid the hysteria. We won’t label paedophiles monsters; it won’t be taboo to see and name what is happening in front of us.”

No where does she actually claim that we should allow adults to have sex with children. She simply advocates acknowledging the impulse, so that people can talk about their issue and learn to control it.

Even more than what the article itself says is the fact that Rush Limbaugh is trying to pretend that a group of people in the US are attempting to “normalize” the sexual abuse of children based on a single story in a British newspaper about differing academic viewpoints on the subject.

Rush’s only other piece of “proof” is vague references to Kevin Clash and his recent sex scandals. 

Share This Post:
    • kiki

      I am not fan of Rush Limbaugh – I find him to be a hypocritical dirt-bag who uses heavy handed manipulation to make his arguments. However, my question is why the original article was posted in the Guardian to begin with. The Guardian is a magazine crusading for homosexual rights. Every author has an agenda, whether they state it openly or not. Rush’s agenda is clear – mass panic and public fear, linking homosexuality and pedophilia. What is John Henley’s agenda? Is it that pedophilia is just another sexual orientation? While there is a HUGE difference between having impulses and acting on them, it sounds like Henley is arguing that there is nothing wrong with a grown person being sexually attracted to children, as long as the impulse does not become action. As you said yourself “no one would ever suggest that sex with children is appropriate unless they were mentally unstable.” Is it the act of sex with children that makes one “unstable” or the desire itself, which some suggest be remedied through simulated images? While Rush’s motives are clear, I find Henley’s less so, and I am tempted to ask, Ok what’s your point?

    • Pingback: Gay Agenda - There Isn't One